Pages

Monday 25 April 2011

Final DCS blog post- Privacy

In an earlier post I mentioned the issue of privacy online and how we are happily giving away every detail about ourselves online, which isn’t always a good thing.  As this is my final reflective blog post for my Digital Communications Strategies unit and I can talk in more detail about any of the subjects which I have looked at so far, I have decided to look into the issue of privacy in more detail as it was the subject that I found the most interesting and a little worrying!
The subject of “cookies” is interesting when it comes to privacy online. “Every site you visit can place a "cookie" on your hard drive which will record a few crumbs of information about you  ( Valentine, 2009) These cookies make it easy for websites and brands to advertise their products on various different websites that they know their consumers use . They keep track of what you’ve bought and how much you’ve spent and will use this information when trying to encourage you to buy more products that are similar. This is all well and good advertising to you things that the companies and websites think are of interest to you but they haven’t actually asked your permission to store information about you.
A study by Privacy International (2007) looked at a number of different companies such as Microsoft and Google to see how effective their privacy practices were. There were twenty parameters which were employed in the analysis. Some of the categories for analysis were; data collection and processing, openness and transparency, data retention and ethical compass. However “it was not always possible to precisely assess a company’s approach in each category” ( Privacy International, 2007) Each category was assessed on a colour band system:
Privacy-friendly and privacy enhancing
Generally privacy-aware but in need of improvement
Generally aware of privacy rights, but demonstrate some notable lapses
Serious lapses in privacy practices
Substantial and comprehensive privacy threats
Comprehensive consumer surveillance & entrenched hostility to privacy

( Privacy International, 2007)
Each company was given a rating in each category and then it was averaged out to get a final score.
Google was scored as being the most “hostile “ to privacy, which Privacy International has noted as being maybe seen as controversial. One of the reasons for Google’s low ranking is “its aggressive use of invasive or potentially invasive technologies” ( Privacy International, 2007)
Google were involved in a big scandal in several countries last year after it admitted that “it’s street view mapping cars had inadvertently collected browsing information over wireless networks, although it says it is highly unlikely that any of the data would be useful” ( Beaumont, 2010)  
The article also talks about people’s concerns over their Facebook accounts, as the site was thought to be “tinkering with privacy settings, which has made more personal information publicly visible by default” ( Beaumont, 2010) However there are a number of controls which you can change in your individual account settings , but they are automatically set to everything being public unless you physically change it yourself.  
Another scandal surrounding Facebook and privacy issues was in July 2009, An online security consultant who wished to highlight the social networking site's privacy issues published a list of data taken from more than 100million users' profiles (Quigley, 2010)

The file was downloaded by a lot of people but Facebook claimed that the information was “already freely available” (Quigley, 2010) They also said that people” own their own information and have the right to share only what they want, with whom they want and when they want” ( Quigley, 2010)This claim says that it is up to the users of Facebook as to who sees their private information but this isn’t the case. This could be seen as Facebook trying to shift the blame for the information being readily available to the public, which isn’t good PR for the brand.  This shows that with the popularity of Facebook increasing and the things you can do on Facebook increasing, they may have allowed the website to become more lax on security . “Facebook’s frequent modifications, designed to maximize both the level of interaction (and engagement) and thus the amount of data that can be captured and used” ( Andrejevic, 2011). As a Facebook user myself I regularly go into my privacy settings to check they are all correct and that I’m not sharing any personal information with anyone who I am not friends with. However, there are plenty Facebook users who don’t check their settings and then wonder why they can be contacted by people they aren’t friends with or by advertisers. According to an ABC News article “ Facebook acknowledged a problem with its site that reveals your name and names of your Facebook friends to some advertisers, and potentially tracks the websites you visit online” ( Worley, 2010) This relates back to what Valentine said about how cookies work, storing information from websites that people visit.  This video relates to how information is being shared through social networking.


The issue of privacy will always be around where online advertising and especially social networks are concerned. There will continue to be scandals and news stories claiming that people’s data isn’t safe online and personal details have been leaked. The privacy policies that are in place aren’t always clear to users on what is and isn’t being shared with the public and third parties, to minimise worries in the future about privacy online, the policies could maybe be made clearer and easier for people to understand. In my opinion there are more and more reasons to worry about privacy online, with the increasing amount of time people are spending online; shopping, studying, social networking they are at more risk of their private details being shared. The amount of times we enter our card details online without thinking twice is worrying, we don’t know who those details are going to be shared with. But with this in mind, will we actually think about this next time we buy a CD from Play.com?  No, in all honesty we probably won’t!

Word count : 1,028

References:
Andrejevic, Mark. 2011. Surveillance and Alienation in the Online Economy. Surveillance & Society 8(3):278-287. Available from: http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/ojs/index.php/journal/article/view/alienation/alienation [ Accessed 24th April 2011]

Beaumount, C., 2010 Is it really possible to have online privacy in the internet age?  Telegraph.co.uk . Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7741526/Is-it-really-possible-to-have-online-privacy-in-the-internet-age.html [Accessed 24th April 2011]

Privacy International., 2007 A race to the bottom: Privacy ranking of internet service companies Available from: https://www.privacyinternational.org/article/race-bottom-privacy-ranking-internet-service-companies [Accessed 24th April 2011]

Quigley, D., 2010 Facebook privacy fears for 100m users as their personal details are published on file sharing site Mail Online Available from: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1298600-0A9CBB5F000005DC-256_468x353.jpg [ Accessed 24th April 2011]
Valentine, M., 2009 Big Brother is watching you! Privacy issue online Website 101 Available from: http://website101.com/small-business/big-brother-watching-privacy-issues-online/ [Accessed 24th April 2011]
Worley, B., 2010 Facebook: Another privacy scandal ABC News Available from:  http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Consumer/facebook-privacy-scandal-facebooks-watergate/story?id=11912201 [Accessed 24th April 2011]

Facebook Apps Disclose User Info

Sunday 27 March 2011

DCS- Online Ethics

Ethics and Regulation are “hot” words in the advertising industry, they refer to regulating content and the way they talk to people.  As of march 1st 2011 The Uk code of non-broadcast advertising expanded to include online, relating to misleading advertising, the protection of children and social responsibility. The CAP code can be found at http://www.cap.org.uk/The-Codes/CAP-Code.aspx.
Ethics are important to any company as they need to rely on consumers having trust in their brand so that the can therefore be loyal.  If a brand has any negative publicity regarding ethics or social responsibility then they are likely to see it affect their brands status and customer following.  They will also be very unlikely to attract any new customers. Now that online advertising has become increasingly popular, companies also have to worry about everything they do in their online adverts but also on their Facebook and Twitter pages.
Social media can be a good way to gain brand awareness for charities, there are many ways in which they can do this, by having a page where people can donate to a cause, having an intereactive application where you do something which will raise or donate money or just by having a pag to make people aware of what the cause does.

The website , http://www.squidoo.com/top10facebookcharityapps has compiled a list of the top 10 charity applications on Facebook and each one has different ways which people can get involved with donating or raising money for the cause.
I personally think that social media can be a good way to advertise your brand but you need to make sure you are ethical and show you know your consumers and can relate to them.  However, I don’t think that brands that use a “world disaster” to gain publicity for their brand are very ethical with using online media, for example with the search engine Bing, asking people to retweet a message with their name in, saying they will donate money to the Japan Tsunami appeal everytime someone does, on Twitter.

References:


Sunday 20 March 2011

DCS- Digital Activism

“Activism the doctrine or practice of vigorous action or involvement as a means of achieving political or other goals, sometimes by demonstrations or protests etc. “ (Dictionary.com)  There are many ways to show activism, but as the digital world has continued to grow, it is more commonly used online. . The meta activism project builds a toolkit that allows online potential activists to become politically and socially active. Mary Joyce ( Mcmanus, 2010) said that the “practice of using digital technology for political and social change” Facebook and Twitter amongst other social media platforms can be used as a means of protesting and using digital activism. A good example of how Facebook has been used as a way of trying to actively change a social norm was in 2009 when there was a Facebook campaign launched to get “Rage against the machine” to number 1 instead of the X Factor winner. The group claimed that they were fed up of the predictability of the music charts and the success of “The X Factor”. According to the creators of the campaign Jon and Tracey Morter the campaign started out as a “ silly idea that makes you laugh in your own home” ( BBC News, 2009) These platforms are often very cost-effective and bale to reach many people at the same time. 
Digital activism follows a hype cycle :
The hype cycle has 5 stages,  the technology triggers a buzz, there is a peak of inflated expectations, a trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment and a plateau of productivity.
In regards to Twitter a recent article on the BBC News page discussing Oprah winfrey’s first tweet on air during her programme, which led to a 43% increase in traffic to the Twitter website  because eof the Oprah effect. However, Twitter has only just peaked in popularity but one of the co-founders Mr Stone said that “ if the early response to the service had not been so positive, it would probably not have survived” ( Shiels, 2009)
Is digital activism a new way to express feelings for change and actually get a result at the end of it? Or is it just a way of causing nuisance? Let me know what you think.

References:
Dictionary.com, definition of Activism. Available from: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/activism [ Accessed 20th march 2011]
Macmanus, R., 2010. Digital Activism: an interview with Mary Joyce Avaiable from: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digital_activism_an_interview_with_mary_joyce.php [Accessed 20th march 2011]
Shiels, M., 2009 Can Twitter survive the hype cycle? BBC News  Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8015777.stm [Accessed 20th march 2011]

Sunday 13 March 2011

DCS- Is there such thing as absolutely private?

Privacy if often described as the state of being free from intrusion or disturbance in one’s private life or affairs. With today’s growing technology is it possible that anything is truly private?
Take Facebook for example , there are so many different elements which come under “privacy settings”, you have to go every single thing separately , wall posts, photos etc and check if you want friends to be able to see them, friends of friends as well or everyone.  Although up until recently they had sort of generic privacy settings which just had everything under one heading and you chose who could see it. However, when it was switched to the new privacy settings it didn’t alert you and you didn’t realise that it had changed the settings. I only found out because someone said something to me about it and I looked and had to change all my settings because it was automatically set so that everybody could see everything on my page.
It’s a bit worrying to think how easily someone could gain access to details of your life through something like Facebook. I personally used to put a lot of things on Facebook without even thinking about it, but after hearing some horror stories on the news I now think twice about it. You hear stories about people saying that they’re going on holiday on Facebook and then coming hoem to find it that they have been burgled because it was evident on Facebook that no-one was going to be there.
 Big news articles in recent years concerning privacy online have been things like the Wikileaks, "The United States was catapulted into a worldwide diplomatic crisis today, with the leaking to the Guardian and other international media of more than 250,000 classified cables from its embassies" (Leigh, 2010) and in 2007 there was the “lost” disk of 25million UK Child benefit recipients personal details.( BBC, 2007) These stories show the casual nature in which sensitive information is dealt with.
Yet after these horror stories we still willingly put things on Facebook and enter our bank details online to various websites.
So with the complex and fast moving area is it always going to be possible to know if something is actually going to be kept private if it says it is? Well I think in the short term the answer is no.
References:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/privacy
Leigh, D., 2010 US embassy cables leak sparks global diplomatic crisis Guardian.co.uk Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cable-leak-diplomacy-crisis [Accessed 13th march 2011]
BBC News., 2007 UK families put on fraud alert. BBC News.co.uk Available from : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7103566.stm [Accessed 13th march 2011]

Sunday 6 March 2011

DCS- Product placement- good or bad?

As of the 28th February this year, product placement will now be allowed in the UK. This means that brand can pay to have their products featured on a television or radio programme. Obviously, as with every from of advertising there are a set of rules which coincide with this, which can be found at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/commercial-references-television/. So the question here is , is this a good thing or a bad thing that it has been allowed in the UK? And will it lead to certain brands dominating the market?
Well the first piece of product placement was on “This Morning” and it was by Nescafe, it signed a £100,000 deal to feature its Dolce Gusto coffee machine for 3 months in the kitchen area. Now having watched the clip I don’t think it’s actually too obvious that it has been placed there on purpose. Being honest, I didn’t know it was by Nescafe either it just looked like a normal coffee machine that could have been bought from Asda. Now if all product placement is going to be this subtle is it really going to be a problem? Well I don’t think so because if you think about it,  in everything we watch films, soaps and even documentaries there are products being used , so what’s the difference if a brand has paid to have that product there?  No I don’t think there is going to be much difference.
However if we think about the fact that certain brand may try to dominate the market through the use of product placement then it’s a different story.  For a strong brand such as Cadburys then product placement can simply reinforce brand awareness and subtly target their audience in ways they feel necessary. However, a less well-known brand may struggle with using product placement successfully because they may not be able to afford to compete with stronger brands to reach their target audience.
I think that product placement has good points and potential bad points, but I think it is definitely something to monitor and watch over the first few months of use, to see if it can achieve anything for specific brands. 

References:

Sunday 27 February 2011

DCS- Seamless Branding

Seamless branding is all about enhancing the consumer experience, digital can be one way in which this is possible. There are many ways it can be done digitally, through social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter, through mobile phone apps or even microsites. These are all ways in which the consumer can actually interact with the brand. I for instance, “Like” the brand Cornetto UK on Facebook and this is now a way for me to interact with this brand. I can see information about its latest products and any updates appear on my homepage. 









Most brands now have a facebook page which they regularly update to inform consumers about their products or services. I think this is definitely a way forward, because of the high proportion of people using social media sites like Facebook, if they can access information about brands they like without having to go on to their websites they are more likely to take notice of the brands profile because they are not having to leave Facebook. An advantage is also that if , like me , people see they someone has “liked” a brands page on their homepage, they will think “Oh, I like that brand” and press like straight away without thinking twice about it and there we go, they now receive updates from that brands page constantly.
Another digital way of enhancing the consumer experience of your brand is through things such as mobile phone applications. A good example of this is the “Wetherspoons” app, in which if downloaded can direct you to the nearest “Wetherspoons” pub. This allows consumers to be able to access the brand very easily. They are being informed of how to get to the pub and whereabouts the nearest one to them is. Many companies now have “apps” which are available for their consumers to use, Tesco have the grocery scanning app, Aviva has an accident claiming app and even Topshop has an app which is updated 5 times a week and claims to have over 300 new styles added.
As someone who uses apps, I think that this is a good way to enhance consumer experiences. With an app like the “Wetherspoons” I would definitely use this and find it useful because I have been in the situation before, when your visiting a place you’ve never been before and looking for somewhere to eat and you don’t know where anything is and you think oh a spoons will do but you don’t have a clue where one is. An app which is going to take you directly to the desired brand will be a hit because people are lazy and don’t want to have to figure out things for themselves, or if there anything like me they don’t want to stop and ask someone directions!
I think that digital can be very effective in enhancing consumers’ experiences and it does relate to seamless branding, because it can easily give people information about a brand without directly advertising to them and a lot of the time people are choosing to interact with the brand and are actively searching for the information.

References:


Sunday 20 February 2011

DCS- Mobile

It was only a year ago that I got my first smart phone yet I feel now as though I wouldn’t be able to cope without one.  My old Nokia phone was perfect all I needed it for was texting and making calls. Now, my Android smart phone allows me to take photos, video call, send texts and multimedia messages, keep up-to-date on Facebook and Twitter, play games, download numerous apps, listen to music and many other things.


Mobiles have been developing constantly since they arrived in the 1970’s. From the basic 1G , first generation of wireless technology mostly in the form of analogue to 4G which has higher speeds and a higher capacity at a lower cost which can lead to enhanced performance, it supports video streaming and has world wide access.
Denso Wave in 1994, created a two dimensional bar code which would allow its contents to be decoded at high speed, calling these bar codes “ Quick Response Codes” . They can be lcicked on and taken to a mobile site. QR codes can be relevant in the world of advertising and marketing because they can be highly useful in getting a brand or product noticed through the latest technology. However, not everybody with a smart phone is going to be interested in using QR codes. They can be placed in magazines, a newspaper, and posters or even embedded in a internet ad.
Stump et al (2008) said that “Mobile enables consumers to stay in constant contact with others; allows them to gather information, entertain themselves, and engage in transactions; and serves as an important element of identity construction and expression for many individuals.” For many people having a new or up-to-date mobile is very important, it is about social acceptance and being seen as “cool” especially in younger generations, people often talk about what applications they have on their phone and what they use them for, which could lead to the QR codes being used in response to advertising and word of mouth.  QR codes are the biggest driver of traffic to mobile internet.
Mcstay, (2010) claims that “mobile represents a range of opportunities for advertisers, sponsor and marketers” he said that one of the benefits of mobile advertising for businesses is the “ ability to target of-the-moment and close to real-time sales messages” This along with the benefit of mobile marketing being personal and trackable can be reasons why advertisers should start to use mobile marketing more.  Mobile advertising has been increasing quarter-on-quarter, and was worth £28.6m last year (Guardian, 2011)
This along with online advertising poses the question whether with all this increasing technology, will traditional advertising become less popular and relevant in years to come ?
Please feel free to comment if you have any opinions on mobile advertising.

Sunday 13 February 2011

DCS- Interactivity

Interactivity can be defined as “two way influence” and also can be described as “many-to-many” communication.  When talking about “two way influence” there are three areas to think about, Choice- there are 200 channels on the TV but although this is a lot to choose from it doesn’t mean it’s interactive. The second area is Involvement- books and films may “involve” us but we cannot influence them therefore it is not two way. The final area is Active Audience- the interaction between memory and the imagination means we are active when we consume media  but again we cannot influence it , so therefore it is not two way.
Two types of interactivity that are important are person-to-person interactivity and person-to-machine interactivity. Person-to-person interactivity allows communication between people, it may be described by the number of people it can reach, the speed of communication or the ease of use. Person-to-person interactivity dominates web and mobile phone communication and allows a much higher degree of person interactivity than traditional media.
Steuer, (1992) defines Person-to-machine interactivity as “the extent to which users can participate in modifying the form and content of a mediated environment in real time”, it may allow person interactivity and like Person-to-person interactivity the web has high potential for this form of interactivity.
You often can’t tell the difference between person-to-person or person-to-machine interactivity, because sometime an interactive function uses both.  There are certain cases where each one is more relevant. In terms of social tasks person-to-person interactivity is most appropriate and person=to-machine interactivity favours things like the task of information searching.
Deighton and Kornfeld believe that where the consumer is concerned there are five paradigms in which relate to how consumers use media differently. These are:
1.       Thought tracing- people search the web for information or entertainment.  Businesses can infer states of mind from the content of the search and then serve the relevant advertising.
2.       Ubiquitous connectivity- people integrate always-on-computing into everyday life. Firms can exploit information on proximity and pertinence to intrude.
3.       Property exchanges- people participate in anonymous exchanges of goods and services.  Firms compete with these exchanges rather than participate with them.
4.       Social exchanges- people build identities within virtual communities; firms can sponsor or co-opt communities.
5.       Cultural exchanges- people observe and participate in cultural production and exchange. Businesses offer cultural products or sponsor their production.

They argue that the developments in” interactive technologies in the past decade lead to the conclusion that direct marketing is not appropriate for interactive marketing”. They felt that in terms of marketing, interactivity needs to be used to facilitate people’s identity projects.
To use interactivity effective, the needs of the consumer need to be fulfilled, through social exchanges or even through the search of information, for example on Google. Advertising on Google can be effective to businesses because it is not getting in the way of their information search, it is simply relating to their search and therefore will appeal to the consumer.  
“In the age of digital communication anyone who has the power to harness technology has the power to harness political and social power itself” ( Rheingold). This can easily be applied to the world of advertising and marketing communications.  If advertisers and marketers use technology to their advantage to reach consumers they can gain social power. The power of the crowd is an area in which could be seen as important to advertisers because of the use of User Generated Content, if they can use interactivity into these areas they could use this means of digital communications to successfully gain the needed social power for their brands.

References:
Deighton, J and Kornfeld, L., 2007 Digital Interactivity: Unanticipated Consequences for Markets, Marketing,and Consumers Available from: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5783.html [Accessed 13th feb 2011]



Sunday 6 February 2011

DCS- What did we do before we had the internet?

It’s hard to believe that digital communications haven’t always been around. The first email was sent in 1971 and if we think of how the digital world has developed today, it’s impossible to think of a time before the internet.
The internet has become such an integrated part of everyday life. It is used to keep into contact with people, to gain knowledge, to share opinions and is also now more frequently used by the advertising and marketing industry.
"The first digital advertisement in the form of a banner ad, was launched by AT&T in 1994 on Hotwired’s pages”(Doubleclick, 2005 cited in Mcstay, 2010) The digital world of advertising has since developed into many areas such as , virals, pay per click, social media and digital marketing. Mcstay, notes that it is a “maturing industry” meaning that it at this moment in time, it can keep being developed and be used as a tool in the marketing industry. Although initially there were some doubts about the use of digital advertising due to the early look of pages which consisted of solely text. Today it is “the fastest growing advertising medium, growing faster than any other advertising or marketing channel “( Mcstay, 2010)

Sherman 2008, claimed that traditional advertisers now see online advertising as “ a platform that encompasses all the media before it and stirs the pot to the boiling point with a large dose of interactivity”  ( cited in Mcsaty, 2010) A main reason why online campaigns seem to be successful is the added component that is interactivity. It makes the advertisement more interesting to the consumer and almost makes it seem as though it isn’t actually just an ad. An example of brand that is successful with online campaigns is Cadburys; last summer saw the “Spots vs Stripes” campaign hit our screens and our computers.  They had games included on their website and banner ads on Facebook, which allowed people to choose a side or play a game. This year Cadbury’s are launching a new online campaign for the Crème Egg season. According to Brand Republic 2010 Cadbury’s campaign continues the “goo on the loose” theme and will feature an online games which is called “ your country needs goo” , it will challenge players to find eggs hidden on various websites such as YouTube and Yahoo. There will also be an interactive quiz on it’s Facebook site.


Social media has proved popular with advertisers since its growth in the early 2000’s. One of the most popular forms of social media is Facebook. As a user of Facebook myself, I do have to think sometimes about what my life was actually like before Facebook. I am what some may call a Facebook addict I am on it at least once a day and also spend most of the day checking it on my Smart phone.  
Television took 13 years to reach 50 million viewers whereas, Facebook added 100 million users in just 9 months. The popularity of Facebook is unbelievable; this is why many advertisers have started to use It as a way of advertising their brand or product to their relevant target audiences. 


This clarifies that the audience is there for online advertising so why not use it. If it can allow you to effectively get your message across to your target audience then it should be a reliable media platform for your brand to use. 

Thanks for reading, feel free to comment if you have any opinions on digital advertising.

Refrences:
Mcstay, A.,2010 Digital Advertising Palgrave Macmillan:Hampshire
Brand Republic,2010 Cadbury unleashes online games return for Creme Egg season" Available from: http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletin/digitalpmbulletin/article/976423/Cadbury-unleashes-online-games-return-Creme-Egg-season/?DCMP=EMC-Media-PM-Bulletin [Accessed 6th February 2011]

Sunday 30 January 2011

Fashion: Not only the clothes we wear.

Fashion? What is fashion? Yes, its current styles and trends, but is also so much more. It defines who we are and it’s the way of expressing ourselves. It’s not just about the clothes we wear, it’s about the hairstyles we choose, the places we choose to meet with friends and even the cars we drive.
Fashion is important in my life. I read magazine after magazine to see what the latest trends are.  I spend hours shopping online on various different fashion outlets, ASOS, Boohoo, Desire Clothing, you name them I’ve been on them!  Fashion is forever changing and that’s the beauty of it, but styles always come back in.  Take leggings for example, I wore them when I was around 5 and hated them they were ugly looking things, now leggings are highly in fashion.
  As Coco Chanel said “Fashion is made to become unfashionable” . As soon as a trend takes it off and everybody is wearing it becomes unfashionable.  Fashions are meant to change otherwise there would be no such thing as fashion. 
Fashion is everywhere, on the tv, in magazines, on the internet and in the street. No matter how hard you try to escape from it, you can’t. Even if you believe your look is truly individual and doesn’t revolve around fashion, it isn’t , unless you make your own clothes that no-one else can buy!

Anyone have any comments about what fashion means to them?

Sunday 23 January 2011

hello,

Hi, I am a second year advertising student at Bournemouth University. I have just been told that this term I will be assessed on a weekly blog, something I have never written before, so this should be fun! I guess seeing as being a student I spent most of my time on the internet this shouldn't be too hard to maintain, although unlike Facebook I won't have a homepage clogged up with people "liking" every page possible. 
So I am already running out of things to say so I'll leave it for now. =)